Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Natuerich's commentslogin

We will do very well as a purely digital world: everyone thinks they make it because they have an edge while realizing to late it's not.

What a naive take on using 20k


I'm pretty sure this is not as complex as it reads (private network, ipv6, cloudflare etc).

But I would assume that two hetzner server for 100$/month an nginx properly configured would do the same thing.

Nice writeup cool to get insight:)


I don't even know if you'd need two servers. Spin up a few Docker containers on the 512gb raid array and you could serve the forum and mods on the same machine. It's not like OpenTTD has the user demands of Reddit or Huggingface.


2 for having a backup server ;)


While Google does has an interest in people having a secure tool to use their services, the fundamental way Google is as accessable to everyone as it is is because of ads

It's shitty.

Now Google makes this shitty existing architecture better.

At least I agree to the op and think this is better.


I find it far fetched that those experts didn't knew they are acting as a type of bank and wouldn't talk to a lawyer upfront.

I did clarify things with a lawyer for a very small company.

They accepted the risk, they lost.


Chatbots we're stupid.

Chatbots with ai will not be the same.




...which is not the case here at all as there are endless links to _research_ on climate change being real and man made. Some of which can be found in the 500+ references on the linked wikipedia articles.


Just read the Wikipedia article about it...

Srsly we have 2023 :-(

And obviously other faces were calculated in like sun phase etc....

Even in hn people are not able to just research this properly :(


When smart people decide not to accept a given fact no matter the evidence, they become really good at denying it. Instead of accepting the fact, there is always the next "what about ...?"


[flagged]


Appeal to authority fallacy occurs when someone asserts a claim solely based on the authority or expertise of an individual or group, without considering the evidence supporting the claim. However, in the case of climate change, the scientific consensus is derived from a robust body of evidence and research conducted by thousands of scientists worldwide


That said, the level of proof is mostly conjecture, contrast and comparison. There are a lot of other mitigating factors at play when we're talking about a solar system. It's not significantly different than what was pushed as the heart-health cholesterol hypothesis as fact for half a century, and was in fact wrong, dramatically wrong.

The level of alarmism doesn't help. According to 2001, Florida should be underwater right now. And that is as we, as a global population haven't dramatically changed much of anything. I'll believe the alarmism, when treaty proposals don't draft out massive exclusions for India, China and African nations.


Do you have an example? Because all of the variations in recorded history, the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age, were less than 0.5C. Also, both were regional and came on over centuries.

Also, the difference between the Ice Age and current interglacial was only 4C. The transition took 6000 years. We are approaching 1.5C and should hit 3C. That is the opposite of Ice Age in a century.


You know just because someone else doesn't play with you doesn't mean you should not play.

Or try.

And yes it makes a huge difference. China is not ignorant if the other world leaders change their whole economy to renewable.

On one site it's a huge market for China and it makes those countries independent. Energy rules the world.

And yes it makes a difference for me if I do my part and it didn't work out or if I did not.


More so, we can't expect China and others to play nice if we don't, so we should lead the way.


Are you seriously comparing the massive economic impacts advocated by these policies to children playing? And yeah, feel free to give me a ring when China purposely weakens their own economy because they saw the West doing it - I'll buy you a beer.


Yes.

And no I believe renewable is the next economy topic.

Transforming everything is a lot of jobs/work and will make energy cheaper and countries less dependent.


OK, fair enough. Sorry for the snark, I had a rough day yesterday. Would love to see a future filled with cheap, reliable, renewable energy.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: