Sony Ericsson has been consistently profitable. Not hugely, but still. I don't see how adding a profitable company to their portfolio will somehow endanger them.
You don't. But given a large enough group of people, some will contract the infection "organically." So some people get a vaccine and some get a placebo and then you check back in years later and see if the vaccine group has a lower infection rate.
Phase 1 trials are for safety, not efficacy -- they don't care if the participants are infected with HIV, because they only want to make sure that the vaccine doesn't hurt them.
In this case, they seem to be testing the blood for markers that should indicate an ability to repulse an HIV infection. Not the most scientifically informative experiment one can imagine, but also pretty straightforward ethically.
my chrome browser froze upon "inspect element" - perhaps that is intentional of the author to prevent me from seeing how he made those cute clouds move.
However, M1573RMU74710N makes a good point - engineers are tested on their code.
M1573RMU74710N just gave Loren the answers to the interview questions "how would you optimize this site?"
seems like the comments validate OP's point on Linkedin being big recruiting mechanism.
Does it add anything more than being a Monster 2.0?
I'd like to think so. It's a good global address book of my contacts.
However, the interface is quite bad. Linkedin could be so much more than it is right now.
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-10-25/strategy/3032...