Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bshimmin's commentslogin

Not to worry, though: his grandson, Louis, is in charge of Palantir in the UK. Definitely nothing concerning about that!


Why would that be at all concerning? His grandson is guilty by blood?


From my experience guilt by blood is something that rears it's head surprisingly often even in progressive rhetoric.

For specific people but even for populations. Adjust the population a bit to one perceived to be disadvantaged in the past or bring their thoughts to a certain context and often you can trick em into essentially almost quoting these guys stopping just short of blut und boden.


Ask Marine Le Pen about her blood type as it might motivate her.


So many of the negative comments about Villeneuve's Dune in this thread are astonishing to me, but I will just pick this one: surely scale is something that Villeneuve does so brilliantly! From Arrival, though Blade Runner 2049, to his Dune, he has an amazing ability to make things seem vast (space ships, buildings, cities...) - it's almost a trademark of his work, to me, so colour me baffled that you would single this out for criticism.

(For context, I read and enjoyed the Dune books as a child, I've seen the Lynch film several times and find it broadly comical, I love Twin Peaks, and I think Villeneuve is arguably one of the best mainstream directors working right now.)


I think the GP meant Lynch's world (universe) felt bigger, more mysterious. Like there were more things going on outside this story than could ever be told. Not that the physical size of things was too small. I think I agree a bit. But that universe is supposed to be small and claustrophobic I think? It is part of the lesson in the last few books. I liked the scifi miniseries the best but mostly for what came after the first book. Lynch's I liked when young, but even then I found the amount of internal narrative extremely irritating. The new one jas the problem of most every adaptation of a beloved and dense written work. It tries to serve existing fans and the casual viewer with the same movie. It does much better at that than anything but Jackson's lotr I think, but it is always hard.


Here's the charity responsible for this bridge and several others in London: https://www.citybridgefoundation.org.uk/about/history Founded in 1122, which is quite something!


They used to obtain funds by renting out space on the bridge, so the old bridges used to have houses and shops on them - cantilevered or to the sides.


Great comment! For anyone looking to learn a bit more about this, the "crossing" technique described above is called "chiasmus": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiasmus

Another famous example is "Vivāmus, mea Lesbia, atque amemus" from Catullus 5 (there are several instances of it in this poem, in fact).


And, of course, speaking of Lesbia (traditionally identified as Clodia Metelli, otherwise known as Quadrantaria), one should mention her “sparrow” mentioned in Catullus 2: https://www.historytoday.com/archive/natural-histories/catul.... Reading that article again I saw a tidbit I missed before: “As Richard Hooper has recently pointed out, ‘in Egyptian hieroglyphics the determinative for “little, evil, bad” was … śerau, the sparrow’”. And so it is: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sparrow_(hiero....


Yahoo ("once the most popular web site in the U.S.", according to Wikipedia)?


Yahoo was more of a slow decline, and missed opportunities. They could have actually acquired Google and/or Facebook at one point, and could have been acquired by Microsoft at a later point.

The comment talks about "quickly changes the world around us rather fundamentally", "knocked off their perch", and "within a few years", which doesn't seem like an accurate description of what happened with Yahoo.


They are considered to be self-employed. If they're earning more than £1000 a year, then they need to file a self-assessment tax return with HMRC, and if they're earning more than a certain amount, perhaps £12500 a year, they will need to pay income tax on those earnings (plus national insurance).

Do most gig workers actually do these things? I have no idea.


This is such a helpful comment - what looks, to the uninitiated, like line noise actually starts to make some sense now!


Lol, yes! That language looks like it was optimized for code golfing or something.


It was optimized for interactive use by people that already know it.


have you ever wanted to hand write minified javascript? boy have i got the tool for you.

want an ip address as an integer?

    .z.a
    -1062731737i
what about TLS connection status?

    0N!h".z.e";
    `CIPHER`PROTOCOL!`AES128-GCM-SHA256`TLSV1.2
absolutely beautiful language


Which is a nice target to have. Makes me want to learn the language.

Modern tech is so obsessed with high-turnover, sale-by-first-impression user growth toy software mindset, that it completely forgot about the idea of creating and optimizing tools for people who use those tools day in, day out.


No it didn't come on. Languages and libraries are still written by developers, who make tools based on their experiences and preferences using tools. A dense tersely named standard library is simply not pleasant to use for most people, and so most people won't develop one for themselves or others to use.

Something that's easy to understand on a first impression is easy to understand on every subsequent impression as well. At least in terms of languages and libs no one is optimizing for that first impression, it's just a byproduct of making it easy to use in all cases.


As a daily user of kdb+/q, I can say that at least for me, it's one of the "best feeling" and most ergonomic tools i've ever used.

I can actually query and understand tables in a very fast REPL in a way that would require 20-30 lines of SQL, nested subqueries, etc.

Even things like the way "left joins" work in KDB feels more natural than left joins in other SQL databases. https://code.kx.com/q/ref/lj/


I second that. It feels like an abacus after a while


Interesting. This syntax reminds me a bit of the R package data.table's terseness for joins:

  B[A, on="x"] # A left join B
  B[A] # same, assuming x is the key column on both, like K's lj [x;y]
  A[B, on=.(x, y<=foo)] # right non-equi join


That's because kdb tables are much more similar to R dataframes (ordered maps of vectors), rather than to relational algebra used in RDBMS/SQL (logically sets of rows). That's for in-memory only (RDB), ignoring historical data (HDB) and persistence since kdb is a real database.

  // kdb+/q
  t: ([] sym:`AAPL`IBM`GOOG; price: 139.09 124.23 948.82; vol: 123456 98765 54321)

  # R
  df <- data.frame(sym=c("AAPL", "IBM", "GOOG"), price=c(139.09, 124.23, 948.82), vol=c(123456, 98765, 54321))


I'm slightly surprised no one has commented on the custom infix operators. I think if I encountered the example in the wild, I'd understand it was a clamp function based purely on the names, but if it were used for anything else I'd have to spend quite a lot of time puzzling over it. Perhaps they make more sense to Haskell people, though!


A word of warning: a few years ago, the related page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-place_artifact took me down one of the worst Wikipedia procrastination rabbit holes I've ever lost myself in.


If you enjoy that kind of thing then you might like Terry Pratchett's early SF work "Strata" that riffs heavily on this idea (on a less parochial scale) while also enjoyably sending up Niven's Ringworld and a few other tomes.


There is also 2022 Netflix series "Ancient Apocalypse", presenting a theory that there was a civilization (not industrial, but like Romans or Egyptians) living on the coastal areas during last ice age, but their traces have disappeared now that sea level is 120 meters higher than during ice age.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Apocalypse


In the same vein, I’ve heard historians theorize that Doggerland was the most comfortable area for human habitation in Northern Europe during its existence, with its lowlands, lakes and river systems perfectly matching the landscape of the other ancient civilization centers. The lands of the modern UK and Scandinavia were by comparison inhospitable highlands, where humans have moved after their ancestral lands were flooded.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doggerland and the episode of BBC In Our Time podcast on the subject.


I haven't seen the show, but I'm captivated by the idea that there are probably thousands of submerged sites like Cosquer Cave that hold traces of human history that are lost to both time and the sea. It's not on the same level as a city, but I am intrigued by it's existence nonetheless. It is also somber to think about how much artwork in that cave was washed away when it was flooded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosquer_Cave


How kind of you to include a link to that very page with your post!



There's a "b" in "about", but there's no "k" or "m".


No 'm' either:

    (def phrase "Fjord zoologists quip jovially, waxing lyrical about xanthic lutrines")
    (require '[clojure.string :as str])
    (-> phrase str/lower-case distinct sort)
    ;; => (\space \, \a \b \c \d \e \f \g \h \i \j \l \n \o \p \q \r \s \t \u \v \w \x \y \z)
(edit: OP originally just mentioned 'k' but then ninja-edited in the 'm')


Python:

  >>> phrase = "Fjord zoologists quip jovially, waxing lyrical about xanthic lutrines"
  >>> import string
  >>> set(string.ascii_lowercase) - set(phrase.lower())
  {'k', 'm'}


Concise!


You are right, I did - sorry. I wrote something similar in Ruby to check!


It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times! You stupid monkey!"


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: