Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | david_shi's commentslogin

"No reasoning. No capability. Just exploitation of how the score is computed."

The irony that this was very clearly written by an LLM, double negation always the simplest and clearest tell.


you say humans never use such a style? I wonder, how did LLMS invent it then.

are agents the primary usecase? curious who you think would find this the most helpful

Agents, ai code executions are a very good use case.

I think anyone looking to use infra that needs below properties are well served by this project: 1. subsecond vm cold starts 2. kernel isolation (vs containers) 3. consistent local <-> remote environment 4. elastic cpu, memory. 5. ease to setup.

I am designing it as a infra primitive on purpose for general workloads as opposed to others in the microvm space i.e. firecracker was designed for lambda/serverless workloads.


The application layer has way more gravity than the networking one right now. You'd need to fork that for anything to happen.

It's (mostly) not the networking layer where people pay to target us. It's the application layer that would most benefit from being forked.

Of course the problem is that what can be forked already has been. Federated social media. Distributed git hosting. However most "essential" uses are centralized and often also commercial in nature. If you fork Amazon you're ... still Amazon. That sort of thing.


Can't have network effects without lock in effects as well.

What would you do? The system is very good at transmuting critiques of it into its own propagation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_for_Now


How I imagine "wololo" would practically work

Can't wait for the movie about this to come out.


The first assumption has been long disproved since multiple full scale Discord data leaks. If it's a public server, it can be scraped.

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/04/billions-of-s...


Very cool. Have you checked out some of the other networks?


It seems like this is designed for atomic purchases, could it be extended for subscriptions?


Hey, I'm one of the developers at Tempo. We're working on an extension type for subscriptions to propose being added to the spec as well! We're starting with the simple types, but subscriptions are a natural extension. The subscription intent will work similarly to a one-time charge—the server returns a 402 with intent="subscription", and the client signs a recurring authorization.


Cool, would be nice to get specifics on how payments are processed, failures, and cancellations re: the recurring model.


> MPP provides a specification for agents and services to coordinate payments programmatically, enabling microtransactions, *recurring payments*, and more.


https://docs.stripe.com/payments/machine/mpp

Yeah I read that copy too, did you read the spec?


I believe the Shared Payment Token is interchangeable with a payment method id that you attach to a customer object, but that link has very sparse information about how things actually work end to end and what objects mean what.


Yeah for sure, I'll add a caveat for public facing skills in production.

Mostly interested in gotchas and efficiency improvements learned in shipping those to multiple harnesses, etc.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: