Isn't Ghostery a better solution for something like this? If we are talking about browsers that is.

This uses less system resources.

Ghostery only works with the web browser. Other apps would be free to continue to embed such links or assets from those locations (and based off my own use of a hosts file, it's more common than I'd like to admit).

urlfilter.ini is even better, less resources

The new plan doesn't fit wide organizations at all. With 300+ users we are looking at $30000 pr year for 70 repositories..

We get the freedom to create more repositories for the price of having to actively kick any inactive user out to save cost.

PS: Please make it like Slack. Don't pay for inactive users that doesn't commit anything that month.

If 1MB is obesity then what is this page? https://www.javapoly.com

That's not so much a web page as a web app masquerading as a page.

Something that compiles and runs java applications in pure JS is bound to use up a shit-ton of bandwidth.

Upwards of 30MB and it took two minutes to execute the call to alert. Only for those who actively hate the visitors to their page.

> then what is this page?

A really bad example to use for bloated pages.

The website loads in 9 seconds (Chrome 50), the processing of the (peg$parseKeyword) functions takes 4.5 seconds of time during loading which causes the gap in the waterfall.

One look at the function would cause severe ingestion in most people.

(You wanted the word “indigestion”. Ingestion means something quite different. Though I suppose if someone was prone to eating when depressed, it could work.)

Its a proof of concept. Common .jars can be cached.