Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sashagim's commentslogin

> whether or not Iran would limit themselves to military targets

This question has long been answered


How is it? So far they seem to be trying to hit actual non-civilian targets. Missing with the rockets on intended targets is a different matter.

And yes, hitting offices with American financial institutions or hotels with American soldiers in them is fine.


Attacks on Israel clearly show that Iran - just like Russia - sees the civilian population as a legitimate target. Question of tactics remains, of course.


So just like US and Israel?


Interesting notion, but how do you know it's 13.6 and not 13.600?


By convention if it was 13.600 they would present it as 13.600 not 13.6. If I remember correctly Everest was first surveyed as 29000 feet tall and they changed it arbitrarily to 29002 to avoid the apparent imprecision!


> Well now I wonder why I assumed that you were a participant?

There are many more students than teachers, so even if hn crowd has x5 number of teachers than students, you're still statistically correct


And I am writing my dissertation, so technically, those stats & the guess are also correct.

2b3a51, interesting planning process. My system with calendar.txt and planning courses: I use week headings for marking the periods and period weeks (4p1). When reserving course days, I just put the tags there (+pw). Later, when I decide the main theme, I add it ("+pw deploy"). If there is a special channel, guests and other info, I add it as it arrives.

For past events, calendar forms a nice basis. At least for me, most of the stuff I plan, happens. I understand you add some insight there, maybe I should try that, too.


* affect :(


The GP made those mistakes on purpose. The parent was adding some more.


And even worse, because they don’t only hurt performance and usability, but they also report private information. Even is the data is sent anymously, the url itself may contain private information. For instance, Google themselves still allow sharing documents via a “private” link which is then stored on some monitoring service. And some of those services allow anyone access and search these urls for some premium plan.


I don’t believe the users are made aware of this kind of usage of their network. In fact, I’m pretty confident that most extension burry this purposefully In such small letters it’s impossible to understand. Which, for me, qualifies them as malware.


What you’re saying is that they are not indeed GDPR-friendly? That would make their claim a false one.


Absolutely. I’m not sure why you’re surprised when 90% of websites out there with a cookie banner also lie (maybe even to themselves) about their GDPR “compliance”.


As long as Google can get away with ‘accept our cookies or you can’t use YouTube’ GDPR is a toothless tiger.


Understanding other’s feelings seems to be only part you’re focusing on, but it’s not enough to have empathy. The dictionaries you’ve linked to have each a list of skills and I don’t think each stands on its own. It’s a combinations of those. I’m sure AI already have, and cenrtainly will have it perfected in the future, an ability to “understand” feelings and emotions if I use the term “understanding” the way you do with sociopaths - the ability to analyze and act on. Certainly it can not be called empathetic.


From Weebly's about page: "More than 325M unique visitors are now going to over 40M Weebly sites monthly."


Google did pull YouTube app from Amazon devices. https://www.engadget.com/2017/12/05/google-blocking-youtube-...


That was in retaliation to Amazon nonsense. Get your timelines straight.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: