Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more scriptproof's commentslogin

Paint.net and Krita both have a simple and intuitive UI. Gimp could get inspiration from them, even for the basic operations.


> It's really a sad story that HTML5 has been evangelized so strongly

SVG is not a part of HTML 5, it is older, while Canvas actually is, and Canvas is as fast as the now defunct Flash. Maybe applying the right technology to a problem would solve the speed issue...


> SVG is not a part of HTML 5, it is older

Maybe not formally, but making that distinction makes no difference to my point.

> Canvas is as fast as the now defunct Flash

...not even close.


> SVG is not a part of HTML 5

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/embedded-content-othe... begs to differ.


It is not blue light but blue LCD. They triggers reactions in retinal molecules that destroy photosensors in the eye.


Surely the light from the sun is a much more damaging? Not to mention computer screens have existed for decades in some form now. I understand the connection with sleep, but Im not sure how much it really damages the eyes compared to other light sources.


Or course sun'rays are damaging, and it is why sunglasses exist. But if you are in front of a computer screen for 7/8 hours a day, you are exposed to blue LEDs which, unlike green and red LEDs are also damging for the eyes.


Opening a white window is like a full headlight in my eyes. Many scientific studies said that blue led (and then white RGB pixels) deteriorate the sight over time, by destructing photosensors in the eyes and they never recover. I would encourage black themes in all apps.


I am not impressed by this exploit, because there are some chance he had studied the document before the presentation, or even asked someone to verify it. He was flawed on many aspects, for example trying to attract developers by dancing and chanting "developers, dev...". His successors put Linux in Windows, open sourced .NET and this seems more efficient... without even harming Windows market share.


> ...trying to attract developers by dancing and chanting "developers, dev..."

That video was from Microsoft's _internal_ company-wide meeting held annually to rally their staff, so your assertion is invalid.

Moreover, it's a bad example to begin with; Ballmer was and still is absolutely correct. What makes the FOSS software ecosystem so successful? That's right: developers, developers, developers. Somebody has to write all that code and it isn't going to be the end-users. When developers get pissed off at a platform, they abandon or fork it, which is why it makes sense to keep developers happy.

Those of us who were around in the '80s-'90s remember that Microsoft's rise to dominance was partly powered by the fact that they offered relatively cheap and good compilers and dev tools and solid documentation to make it easy to develop software for their platform. Contrast that with the workstation vendors back then that charged much more than MS did just to get a compiler.


I did not say he was wrong for trying to attract developers. I said chanting to attract them is ridiculous.

And about compilers, Visual Studio has never been cheap. The express version was added only to counter Turbo C++ and other free tools like MingW.


The one on the right seems tired to hold her torch.


He said, "Are you Isaac Asimov?" And in his voice was awe and wonder and amazement.

I was rather pleased, but I struggled hard to retain a modest demeanor. "Yes, I am," I said.

"You're not kidding? You're really Isaac Asimov?" The words have not yet been invented that would describe the ardor and reverence with which his tongue caressed the syllables of my name.

"Well, I think you're—" he began, still in the same tone of voice, and for a split second he paused, while I listened and the audience held its breath. "—a nothing!"


Ha! What's that from?


Asimov's own biography.


And Visual Basic is above JavaScript! You can forget Tiobe.


Different story. I once asked a question to the author of 7-Zip to include it in a software and received in return a link to the FAQ!


> Hybrid/PWA apps are not in the interest of Apple nor Google

Not in the interest of Apple, of course, because bye tax on apps, but promoted by Google. Surely in its interest.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: