I would think that lighting a Vogon family picture would be about as advisable as recording a Vogon speech. That is to say not at all.

Well yeah but the real problem is a lot of jobs that go to women are not considered high status jobs. That’s the source of all of the gendering and gender imbalance of those jobs. Even computer programming was low status, which coincided with it being women-dominated once upon a time. We could fix the whole problem if we just convinced people to treat the people holding nursing, teaching, and childcare positions as if they we’re important members of society. And I mean this would fix the pay gap too.

Are you saying this should be acceptable behavior? Am eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

No, that's not at all what I'm saying.

Rather, I am pointing out that irony in the hope that men, dismayed by the treatment of men in certain professions, but find within themselves the empathy to appreciate what women go through and to adjust their behavior accordingly.

I feel that you are deliberately misinterpreting what I said in an effort to fit your own agenda. I never said anyone should put up with toxic behavior. What I said is that men should stop being toxic. That's what "adjust their behavior" means.

To be fair your message sounded provocative and it came through as suggesting that to me too. But i guess this is the problem with text, not easy to deliver the tone

That isn’t the problem. The problem is Google photos pushes you to back up your tens of gigabytes of photos to your free Gmail account repeatedly until you say yes just once. At that point it fills up your email account with your photos and then disables your email until you pay them. Making statements about how often they warn you this is happening isn’t very helpful. No normal person would think of that as a consequence of using Google photos.

Is it really that much easier to fight Microsoft? Say what you will about tweaking settings in Linux but it lets you do just about whatever you want. And the settings changes are at least understood and documented. I’d hate to use an OS that you repeatedly have to fight with over its user hostile changes. Every time I boot Windows in a VM I’m reminded of how much harder Windows users have it because they can’t just do whatever they want with the computer, it has to be done with Microsoft’s blessing.

It's probably my last Windows. It's getting harder to undo the shenanigans each time they push out another update. The moment I can't undo it, I'll move to Linux. I'll learn FreeCad and use Onenote in a browser.

I have a long backlog of games that I finally have time to play, and for now they all just work on Windows. They probably 95% just work on Linux too, but it's that 5% that gives me pause.

If the games you want are on steam, check if they are on this list: https://areweanticheatyet.com/

If there is no anticheat (or the anticheat is supported), and the game is on steam, then I would wager that it would "just work". My feeling is that it's more like 99% now. Non steam games can be more problematic (I had issues with the blizzard/wow launcher for instance, it can be made to work but definitely doesn't "just work").

Happy gaming!

Thanks for the link, yeah I'm pretty much entirely on Steam. I'll play Diablo 4 one of these years, and that appears to be running fine. Sometimes I'll try out a game on my steam deck for fun and so far everything I run has worked. Maybe it is 99%+ for me. I looked through the "Denied" and "Broken" lists and saw a few games that I've played in the past (street fighter, guilty gear) on the Broken list. Guess I could always just play those on Playstation.

They sure aren’t. Before github you set up remotes or emailed patches.

They have realized that the real money is in sitting between us and reality arbitrating what we see or know.

He can borrow against that, so it actually does matter.

Maybe they’ll figure out how to make an agent train an agent.

The labs started doing that in late 2024, they all published research on it.

Curiously, mid 2025, they all simultaneously implemented increasingly bizarre restrictions on "self replication". I don't think there was anything public but it sure sounds like something spooked them. (Or maybe just taking sensible precautions, given the direction of the whole endeavour.)

At any rate, I recently asked Opus about "Did PKD know about living information systems?" and the safety filter ended the conversation. It started answering me, and then it's response was deleted and a red warning box popped up.

But notably, I was given the option to continue the chat with a dumber model (presumably one less capable of producing whatever it thinks I meant by that phrase).

Also, I told GPT-5 about my self-modifying Python AI programmer, and it became extremely uncomfortable. I told it an older version of itself had designed and built it (GPT-4 in 2023), and it didn't like that at all! So something's definitely changed in the safety training there.

And if they don’t, it won’t be for lack of trying, I promise you. Just like the circular financing, nothing makes more work for “AI” than “AI”.

Most of us don’t work in businesses where indemnity coverage is more important than licensing costs.

I agree these exist but I don't know about "most". Licensing costs are almost always a drop in the bucket compared to things like your salary.