Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | uerobert's commentslogin

20pt font sizes goes brrr!


Every single PS2 I ever saw growing up was bought in the US (I grew up in a third world country). Consoles in big box stores here were outrageously expensive, like 3 to 4 times the price in the US. It was cheaper to fly to the US to buy one I kid you not, so that was what a lot of people did.

edit: Also all of them were modchipped, you could take any console to any random electronics repair shop to get it modded.


Who gets to keep the nukes?


If world plays the cards right this time - nobody.


What do you mean? All the APIs (Xcode SDK, Metal, ML, etc) required to build on their devices are very well documented.


I mean the documentation of the SoC itself. The thousands (or perhaps tens of thousands) of pages of information about every register and peripheral on it.


I'm not talking about apps on their devices, I'm talking about new types of devices based on their processors.

If these were available for others to buy, I think we would be very surprised by the innovative new devices people would invent.


That “independently verified” part was that they talked with the same source and were told the same thing.


How? In my country for example there is a surge of US companies setting shop here just to hire local devs, and a lot more hiring remote, when their products have presence only in the US. Each year the number keep increasing.


Why the hell would companies sell their stock to raise money to buy their own stock again? That doesn't make sense. If they want to do stock buybacks they just borrow money to do it, but only if interest rates are low enough. In most cases when companies raise money by selling stock you can bet its to expand, by making capital investment, raising headcount, acquisitions, etc. Either at that moment or the near future.


> Union endorsements are valuable, union money, union member donations.

This is why a lot of people oppose unions. You could be contributing for causes you actively oppose, and on top of that against your will.


They are already doing that, hence SV salaries.


While they are indeed very high compared to other professions and the national average, they are still on relatively low growth compared to others. There's also the argument that it's not software engineers that are overpaid, but that everyone else is underpaid [1].

[0] https://apnews.com/1a68c31f2cb54b15af536cbe168442bf

[1] https://qr.ae/TS0Zxe


Facebook is competing with other FAANG [et al] companies for talent, and not all of them are in the same sector. Their market position is only relevant in that it allows them to compete for the kind of talent that $300k a year can buy, and they deem it necessary for maintaining that position, they are not going to pay more than necessary nor are you entitled to more just because they can.

Why does it matter to you whether you make $300k at a company that makes $500k out of you or at one that makes $1m out of you? You would be doing the same job and either way being compensated at the top range of the market for the skills you have. I don't see the point.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: