They essentially said "we're not fans of mass surveilance of US citizens and we won't use CURRENT models to kill people autonomously" and people are saying they're taking a stand and doing the right thing? What???
It's not inconceivable that AI could become better than humans at targeting things. For example if it can reliably identify enemy warcraft or drones faster than people can react. I'm not saying Claude's models are suited for that but humans aren't perfect and in theory AI can be better than humans. It's not currently true and would need to be proved, but it doesn't seem unreasonable. It could well be better than something like deploying mines.
BoreDM (https://boredm.com) | Software Engineer | Boston, MA or Washington, D.C. | Full-time | $90k-$150K+
We’re building the modern standard for subsurface data management. Our software handles borehole logging, lab testing, CPT data, and PDF digitization. BoreDM is used by 40+ geotechnical firms and 20+ state DOTs nationwide.
Looking for a full-stack engineer to join us. Interest or experience in local-first/offline-first architecture is a plus.
I'm running gnome in fedora silverblue on an Intel 13" Framework and I only get ~6 hours of battery life doing web browsing, school work, light programming, and watching videos.
I guess they're evil. Tragic.