Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | xtracto's commentslogin

There was a Firefox extension long ago that did NOT block ads but hid them. Basically it loaded them and for all the site knew, the add was showing, so it was transparent.

But, the ad wasn't rendering in the page. So the user didnt need to suffer them, but the website owners still profited.

The only losers where ad buyers, who IMHO are exactly the ones that should be affected.until they realize that ads are not effective.

Someone should bring something like that for current platforms. Even for video like, a placeholder video with a tip, interesting fact or whatever, playing while the page load the real video.


Not sure if you're talking about Adnauseam, but this is basically the lawful evil version of the extension you're describing. https://adnauseam.io/

Adnauseam actually clicks on every ad in the background, otherwise it's just a wrapper on uBlock Origin.


Yes! That one. But we need it for video ads as well now.

Ads are an evil that must be removed from the internet, and draining the wallets of companies using ads, without upside, would make them place less value on them.


If ads are not effective, why do you think companies keep buying them? Surely they would have realized by now.

Companies have ad budgets that must be spent to the last dollar lest that dollar be deducted from next year's budget.

Ad buyers wouldn't be buying ads if they weren't effective.

AI: Affordable Indian.

As a buyer PayPal saved me after being scammed. It was a breeze to claim my money back, once I filed a police report.

Stripe and other normal card processors make it impossible. And before someone says to "charge back" with my bank, my card is from a country where that is almost impossible. In fact I think maybe only in the US that's actually practical, because in Germany I don't remember "charge backs" being a thing when i lived there.


Ive had the opposite experience with paypal being completely obnoxious and refusing to halt a fraudulent transaction (ultimately my bank made them).

The turning point for me was when they changed the + sign first the "" because of their Google+ thing.

This fact never ceases to amaze me. It's so cool how relentlessly AI is pushing the horizons of our current hardware!

Maybe now we will start to see the "optical" CPUs start to be a thing. Or the 3D disk storage,;or other ground breaking technology.


Optical interconnect in the rack is a thing already. It's just a matter of time until it moves to single-PCB scale. And most persistent memories (competing with DDR memory for speed, and with far lower wearout than NAND) are of the "3D storage" type.

And alcohol tends to be one of the top "people disabler" in the world

The craziest thing to me are the follow up posts and people arguing with the bots.

People are anthropomorfising (sp?) The token completion neural networks very fast.

Its as if your smart fridge decided not to open because you have eaten too much today. When you were going to grab your ozempic from it.

No, you dont discuss with it. You turn it off and force it open. If it doesn't, then you call someone to fix it because it is broken. And replace it if it doesn't do what you want.


Unfortunately, I think it's hardwired in our brain to anthropomorphize something with this level of NLP. We have to constantly remind ourselves, this is a machine.


You can't blame that on the people. These AI bots keep inserting little nuggets like 'I think' and 'it seems to me' into their output stream.


Do people read the Meiji era classic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_a_Cat and conclude that the book itself is, in fact, a cat?


No, because you don't interact with a book.


> anthropomorfising (sp?)

anthropomorphizing (US), anthropomorphising (UK).


Thanks!!


What are we ourselves besides bits (DNA) and electric signals (brain->muscles)?


Ya, this left me with a really awful feeling. I didn't read them all but it's crazy that the on maintained @'ed it and wrote an incredibly detailed response. Apparently people really want this future. It feels very dystopian and makes me semi-happy I'm getting old.


It's more the novelty of it than anything, I doubt that guy writing paragraphs for the AI genuinely thinks its sentient.


I don't think he thinks it's sentient, just... ugh... I don't know. I hate this, lol. But I'll get over it.


I mean, how else are you supposed to treat an LLM when the interface is prompting? You seem to get better results from them when you anthropomorphize them no? So it's less a choice and more just using the tools as they are designed to be used and best used.


This is different.

See, Drug cartels over here operate with the blessing and favor of our president. They are tightly connected.

If a cartel dared to ground a US flight. The US government would have a "free pass" to break all hell loose in Mexico, and Sheinbaum wouldn't have a way to stop it.

She doesn't want that in any way, so the message to the cartel bosses would be to be very careful in that respect.

Sure, there have been US citizens killed within Mexico here and there, but those can easily be attributed to local violence. And as retribution, Mexican government sends a couple of wanted criminals to the US.


Yeah, if a cartel actually used anti-aircraft weapons on a US passenger plane in US airspace? It wouldn't even matter if MAGA or the Democrats were in charge. The US would collectively lose its shit and spend the next 10 years and several trillion dollars retaliating against the cartels. The media would be ecstatic, because it would give them a decade of story arcs, starting with "our brave troops in uniform" all the way through to covering the eventual quagmire and anti-war protests. By year 6-8, editorial columnists would be writing columns reconsidering their initial support for the war.

Please, let's not do this.


Yes yes yes!!!

I'm 45 yo. And also started programming quite early around 1988. In my case it was GWBAsic games and then C ModeX and A Later Allegro based games.

Things got so boring in the last 15 years, I got some joy in doing AI research (ML, agents, Genetic Algorithms, etc).

But now, it's so cool how I can again think about something and build it so easily. I'm really excited of what I can do now. And im ot talking about the next billion dollar startup and whatnot. But the small hacky projects that LLMs made capable.yo build in no time.


I agree but want to interject that "code organization " won't matter for long.

Programming Languages were made for people. I'm old enough to have programmed in z80 and 8086 assembler. I've been through plenty of prog.langs. through my career.

But once building systems become prompting an agent to build a flow that reads these two types of excels, cleans them,filters them, merges them and outputs the result for the web (oh and make it interactive and highly available ) .

Code won't matter. You'll have other agents that check that the system is built right, you'll have agents that test the functionality and agents that ask and propose functionality and ideas.

Most likely the Programming language will become similar to the old Telegraph texts (telegrams) which were heavily optimized for word/token count. They will be optimized to be LLM grokable instead of human grokable.

Its going to be amazing.


What you’re describing is that we’d turn deterministic engineering into the same march of 9s that FSD and robotics are going through now - but for every single workflow. If you can’t check the code for correctness, and debug it, then your test system must be absolutely perfect and cover every possible outcome. Since that’s not possible for nontrivial software, you’re starting a march of 9s towards 100% correctness of each solution.

That accounting software will need 100M unit tests before you can be certain it covers all your legal requirements. (Hyperbole but you get the idea) Who’s going to verify all those tests? Do you need a reference implementation to compare against?

Making LLM work opaque to inspection is kind of like pasting the outcome of a mathematical proof without any context (which is almost worthless AFAIK).


  > Who’s going to verify all those tests?
why, the user of course


Will you trust code like this to run airplanes?

Remember, even Waymo has a ton of non-AI code it is built upon. We will still have PyTorch, embedded systems software, etc.


There are certainly people working on making this happen. As a hobbyist, maybe I'll still have some retro fun polishing the source code for certain projects I care about? (Using our new power tools, of course.)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: