Introverts can easily be good at certain types of sales, which as you correctly point out can often be more about problem-solving and where client interactions are usually structured discussions rather than battles for attention. But not all types of sales are the same, and selling magazine subscriptions door to door doesn't reward deep thought and is certainly tough for people that aren't energised by the prospect of introducing themselves to hundreds of people per day, never mind people who find forced interactions a bit awkward.
I think it stretches the definition of "introvert" somewhat to include people who chose to do door-to-door sales or flogging popcorn at football stadiums for fun, as Warren Buffett reportedly did.
I think it stretches the definition of "introvert" somewhat to include people who chose to do door-to-door sales or flogging popcorn at football stadiums for fun, as Warren Buffett reportedly did.
Ironically, your comment convinced me of the opposite of the point you were trying to make. Sure, door-to-door sales and flogging popcorn involve dealing with a lot of people, but you are only dealing with them superficially. Your job is to get your product in front of as many people as possible but not to connect with them in any meaningful manner. In fact, you will need to deal with near continuous rejection or at least, indifference. It actually sounds to me like those might be better jobs for an introvert than an extrovert.
I think this thread (and everything I've read on this topic in the last few years) proves that people largely don't agree on the definitions of these terms, but having known many people who consider themselves introverted, "dealing with a lot of people superficially", and "dealing with near continuous rejection or indifference" is extremely poorly aligned with their personalities. Speaking personally, those things are my nightmare.
I can deal with rejection and indifference because I don't give a crap about the people on the other end of the transaction. It seems to me that you are describing social anxiety more than introversion. However, that was kind of the point of your comment that not everyone seems to agree on the definition.
I think, however, we are also dealing with understanding the word "superficial" differently. Superficial interactions with people in the sense of meaningless small talk of no consequence is more of an extrovert thing, I agree. However, when I said "superficial," I meant that you aren't really dealing with people at all, but rather hands from which you take money and into which you insert popcorn. There is very little real human interaction in that scenario even if you are technically around people all day.
EDIT: And in the door-to-door salesman scenario (which, I agree, sounds like hell), you are still spending the vast majority of your time alone in your own head walking from house to house.
If you're aiming to deliver a new pitch in 15 seconds time you're not really alone in your own head, especially not if you're scanning the garden for hints and clues that might help you make small talk that stops that conversation from coming to a quick end. But of course, if you like being alone in your own head, nobody's stopping you from not knocking on those doors...
Agreed, introverted people can probably cope with selling popcorn on autopilot surprisingly easily if they don't have related issues with crowds or self-confidence. But is running round a stadium shouting at people the first thing the average teenage introvert thinks of as a fun way to make money, even in a pre-internet age?
I think it stretches the definition of "introvert" somewhat to include people who chose to do door-to-door sales or flogging popcorn at football stadiums for fun, as Warren Buffett reportedly did.