Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hmm... I intended this to be understanding of the situation, but scathing in tone - as in, "FDA, at least to us, this makes it look like you are engaging in 'Diabolical Action Z,' and we don't really have a good way to discern differently without investing dozens of hours of effort, and even then it's uncertain, given our collective expertise level."

Maybe it's better if I put it this way, "I don't actually think the FDA is up to rotten fuckery here, but it sure as hell looks like they're being FUCKING EVIL, and without a method to for to tell that they aren't, they should FUCKING STOP IT."



Here's the question: are they betting that most people will never see the second article, with the caveats and criticism?

Is seems to be the same move as using rebate coupons rather than outright sales.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: