Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What actually works, conflict resolving by party separation and having deterrents that could wipe out both sides leaders.

Pakistan/India. Iran/Iraq. Russia/America.

Conclusion, Nuclear weapons reduce Civil(ized) Wars.



Aren't there lower bounds to the size of the parties for which this would be a guarantor of deadlock? As in, does this work at the gang-scale, or smaller organizations where physical violence is substituted with, say, fees?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: