Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not to mention Google can afford to experiment and make mistakes like Wave, Buzz and Orkut. Whereas Facebook or Twitter don't have that luxury as their revenues are a fraction of Google's.

Personally, I think web search is a lot more valuable compared to social networking. I hardly ever even bother to check my FB profile anymore. If I want to get in contact with a friend, I text or call them on the phone. If I wish to maintain a business contact, LinkedIn is the way to go. At one time MySpace seemed like a good purchase for $580 million. In a bubble economy, things look best right at the peak. I don't know if Facebook has peaked, but if they continue to become ever-more spam infested and continue to annoy and frustrate users over privacy, I can see someone beating them at their own game.



It is however surprising just how big mistakes Wave and Buzz have been (IMHO).


Buzz still seems superior to me technologically. The reason it hasn't caught on is probably either lack of simplictiy, or bad luck/timing.

Wave I see as a work in progress/concept work. Features will probably bleed over to docs over time. In that it is not a failure I would say.


I think part of the reason Buzz hasn't caught on is the privacy debacle at the start. It left people with a bad association with Buzz, and that's not something that's easy to shake.

Wave I see mostly as an experiment. It can do some cool stuff, but I've never really had a use for it. I did see it used for streaming commentary the Google I/O keynote (courtesy of Lifehacker), and it worked fantastically for that. In fact, I'd say that was the nicest live coverage method I've seen. However, I personally still have not found a use for Wave.


For me Buzz is the tweets of about a dozen people I already follow on Twitter.


For me, it's one guy 'liking' YouTube videos.


If Buzz had had a really compelling user experience and killer features at the start then that's what the early media reaction would have been about.

Instead they launched a half-baked product, with high expectations because anything Google does immediately has a high standard to meet, and that let the unforced error they committed with privacy dominate the news.


It's certainly a failure from just how much it was being hyped up as "the next internet" etc.

Yeah I think quite possibly both are superior technically, and I think integrating Buzz with GMail was a good move, but I think they'd do better adding features and iterating gently toward where they want, rather than suddenly introducing new things that confuse/alarm users.


Personally? Lack of integration in clients. Everything hooks into Twitter. Everything hooks into FB. Extremely little hooks into Buzz. I also want more privacy & organization controls than it offers, but I doubt that has a lot of impact outside geekdom.

From my uses, at least. If/when it changes, I'll probably start using Buzz more.


Wave is no mistake (yet), it's still under construction. Also, it's a protocol, not that much a product. Also, the client-server protocol isn't even finished.


You get one chance to make a good impression.

People have moved on. Maybe there will be some killer app (farmville or something) released on top of wave, but I can't see why.

Protocols are fairly easy work. It's getting people to use stuff that's hard.


Please remember that Orkut is still the most popular social networking website in Brazil, by far (and in India too, if I remember well.)

But yeah, I don't know anyone that is using Wave or Buzz.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: