Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Who the heck came up with USB 3.2 Gen 2×2? That has got to be the dumbest idea. No one cares how it works

Well, you will if you end up trying to use a part which supports 2×1 with a part which supports 1×2, since they both support the same top speed, but together they only support the lower speed of 1×1.



I cannot tell if you are joking, and that scares me worse than if you are completely serious.


I'm mostly serious, though I really don't know why 1×2 exists and why you'd build a part that supports it but not 2×2 (or, alternatively, that supports it instead of 2×1, which is, but for a name change, an older standard with the same nominal bandwidth), and the 2×2 will also support 2×1.

But maybe there is an electrical engineering reason why it might be practical to do 1×2 but not 2×1 in some device.


Probably it’s for cables, in that a 1x2 cable can (I assume) be longer for cheaper than a 2x1 cable.


1x2 requires lower frequency electrical signals I suspect? That might be preferable in some scenarios. Still insane.


Just wait, Usb 3.2 1x1x1x1 is just around the corner for high power draw devices!


Yes lower frequency. There is a big jump in implementing a 10G PHY vs a 5G PHY




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: