What are you talking about?

>My comment you’re replying to already acknowledges that this isn’t a convincing argument by itself.

then why make it?

"The fact that you thought this would be a convincing argument is extremely laughable and again, palpably ridiculous."

Which actually probably better applies to your statement about Google specifically being built for US consumers, which is obviously nonsense.

Google works great in Finnish which is a terribly complicated and small language, doesn't seem like an US consumer only product to me.

And anyway, if we're going to focus on the English language word for the Amazon river, then we'd be better off focusing on the English-speaking market. A quick look at wikipedia shows that very few languages besides English use "Amazon".

>then why make it?

As I said, because it's something.