I guess it would be interesting to know how much the USPS is subsiding them, but I think what makes the NPR example striking is that they are comparing end-to-end prices: some business in China is paying less than $5.69 and the American business would pay $6.30 for the same service.
But I suppose part of the difference is not due to the subsidy but because the China post has lower labor costs for the aggregation work?
But I suppose part of the difference is not due to the subsidy but because the China post has lower labor costs for the aggregation work?