Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That sounds incredibly energy-inefficient. On average you have 12.5% of servers running but not contributing and possibly incurring load on other nodes.


12.5% overhead isn't that much. It's what just the networking gear can easily eat in a data center (12% out of all the non-cooling-related power supply).

Reed-Solomon encoding adds 50%, of you want 3 block per 2 data blocks. Replicated encoding (not relevant here since this is allow throughput usecase, but necessary if you want to sustain high read throughput) is adding at least 200% (if you want a 3x replication, which I think should be the minimum).


12.5% is far from the total overhead, just an additional compounding factor.


Turn 'em off if they're not contributing.


Spinning iron doesnt like start/stop cycles. Server drives go thru very few in their entire life for that very reason.


These are ssd’s.


They are not, see the link in the article: https://www.amazon.com/HGST-7-2K-SATA-Drive-Model/dp/B07XQRB...


Oops. Thanks.


87.5% efficient is not incredibly inefficient.


Compared to what though? How efficient is a typical data center? Probably way less than this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: