The doctors were not jailed, because luckily CCP need them to work to fight the virus. Some of them died for it already, mostly due to the hard work, insufficient protection CCP provided to the doctors, and in one case at least, intentionally punish the doc by delay his treatment.
Talking about the origin of this virus, this paper of 2015 is quite interesting: https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
. In this paper, the wuhan P4 institute people basically described how they produced a prototype of the 2019 wuhan virus.
I said in my comment clearly it is a hypothesis. While it is important and useful to think logically the Euclidean way, it is also important to find clues and make hypothesis, that is how people discover things in the real world.
Without information about how this letter was prepared and signed among these people in detail, my hypothesis stands.
Never heard about such a thing. Sounds like some sort of conspiracy theory unless you have concrete proof of that.
The original hypothesis was that some other animal sold at the market acted as an intermediate host between bat and human, just like the case in 2003 SARS, but this is also not proven.
Conspiracy theory has a specific meaning. Their claim might be false but even if this is the case they are not implying the existence of any conspiracy.
The Doctor wasn't jailed ...
The virus was spread at the market. It didn't start at the market.
Until we know where it started we don't know if it would have stopped the virus or not.