You seem to be under the misapprehension that anyone remotely cares. Childish tantrums are counter-productive as they almost entirely blowback onto your own psychological state rather than affecting anyone else's. You are permanently stuck with the contents of your brain; everyone else has a quick chuckle at the troll and continues scrolling past.
Clearly you are immensely frustrated. I suspect this stems from the fact that nearly everyone else either doesn't know and is unaffected, or prefers SyStEmD over sysvinit, or doesn't care one way or the other. For me the whole debate is hilarious because every single objection I've heard about sYsTeMd is one or more of the following:
1. Factually incorrect;
2. Resolved with a trivial config change;
3. Preference for the familiar;
4. Preference for theoretical principles over pragmatism;
5. The kernel is orders of magnitude worse ("but that's different").
These are very broadly defined categories and everything can be conveniently rationalized to fit into them. For example I expect this be downvoted and filed under 3 or 5. (tl;dr: systemd broke a "debug" kernel parameter and handwaved it away with "Generic terms are generic, not the first user owns them." )
