Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thank you for the clue. All the reviews I had read claimed Intel and Samsung SSEs were bulletproof, and everybody else's were trash.

For $300, it should have been a better product. Only 6 months later the competition was getting only $100 for them.



Intel used to have good SSDs, but they seem to have given up on the consumer market. Samsung and Crucial are the only ones I'd trust today, based on my experience.

Although looking at Samsung's smartphones and laptops, they might be skimping on quality, as well :/


Samsung Flash storage I have always had great success with

Intel I would only use Enterprise Class gear, and even then would look to other vendors for storage

Intel trades off their name, and puts out alot of crap at the lower end which they get away with because "No one ever got fired for buying intel"

Alot of these big names do this....


It's funny to see Intel tracing IBM's steps. It's tempting to think they sick of being successful. I think the real answer is ignorance of IBM/Compaq, lack of wisdom, and, the key ingredient: hubris.


Seconding Samsung. I've only had good experiences with them in the past few years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: