I don’t think you understand how offshore works. You seem like someone who saw a bunch of YouTube videos. For example all re-insurance companies that back the US insurance markets are Bermuda companies, and this is explicitly OK in the tax code.
I worked at a company that payed out $700M in an IP dispute involving offshore entities (and worked for a while in an offshore entity, Monaco, though it's a different kind of 'offshore').
Edit: FYI your 'Bermuda' argument doesn't help make your point re: 'neutral ground IP law'. The reason companies exist 'offshore' is to avoid taxation and scrutiny, which is why they are there.
And I’ve worked for companies with extensive offshore arrangements, primarily for tax minimization and regulatory clarity. It sounds like a judge disputed your prior company’s issues!
