> Yea it never bothered me and I never understood why people kept complaining about it online. It seemed very superficial complaint.
Consistency may be superficial to you, but that's a personal preference that not everyone shares.
> The way you use git is by first understanding its model. If you understand the git model, everything makes sense
Doesn't follow. I think I've got at least an acceptable handle on git's model, but I can't see how that should mean I'd have to accept that wildly inconsistent command switches "make sense". Care to explain how one leads to the other?
Consistency may be superficial to you, but that's a personal preference that not everyone shares.
> The way you use git is by first understanding its model. If you understand the git model, everything makes sense
Doesn't follow. I think I've got at least an acceptable handle on git's model, but I can't see how that should mean I'd have to accept that wildly inconsistent command switches "make sense". Care to explain how one leads to the other?