This is great work but...please redo the charts to start at Zero and end at 50,000 to keep things consistent and prevent Edward Tufte from killing a kitten if he ever sees your charts.
"The urge to contextualize the data is a good one, but context does not come from empty vertical space reaching down to zero, a number which does not even occur in a good many data sets. Instead, for context, show more data horizontally! "
A non-zero baseline is fine in some cases (line chart of the temperature of a person with a fever for example), but the issues here were multiple charts at varying Y scale starting points, and bar size comparisons of a property that we do want to go to zero (zero failures).
Yeah, the graphs are misleading because of the varying Y scale.
I do like the conclusions section, though. It presented some insightful analysis of dyno/worker efficiency
>It could be that I’m benchmarking from only 1 server but I’ve seen almost no difference between having 40 dynos or 60. You’ll see one when you receive the bill so be cautious, especially if you use an auto-scale tool.
>The same applies to node with cluster, you can do more with 15 dynos running cluster with 3 workers than with 60 dynos of node alone (for a quarter of the price!).
