Umm, could you help educate us. How do you know/state this so confidently?
The way I see it, there are roughly infinite previously non-constructible parts that by definition we as a society couldn't test. Now that we can construct these new parts, shouldn't we test them and then use them if they are better/cheaper?
There have been rocket engines built by stacking carefully made thin metal slices (with holes cut for coolant channels) and then using diffusion bonding to join them into a single monolith. I could see 3D printing being used for this instead, and perhaps more cheaply.
I see, you just don’t believe that additive manufacturing is a truly new paradigm and that there are parts that can be constructed now that were previously just non-constructible.
COST_3D-(COST_CONVENTIONAL+SALARY_MACHINIST) = SAVINGS
is more than the literally unreproducible parts 3D printing can achieve. These are not comparable quantities.