Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How so? Houses, as a rule, are investments, and like any investments should be considered rationally.


He's saying that half a million is too much for a merely 'nice' home.

But this is just a linguistic conceit on the part of home buyers.

There are mansions (homes that you can't afford), nice homes (homes that you can afford, and are in good condition/areas), and there are slums (homes you can afford, and in bad conditions/areas).

No one wants to live in a slum. No one can afford a mansion. So a 'nice' home is the only realistic choice.


Isn't this the very kind of thinking - thinking that houses are investments and surely the prices will go up - that caused the housing bubble?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: