I did, and they make perfect sense if you look at them through the lens of MWI, which however seems weirdly unpopular in QM circles. I was taught the Copenhagen interpretation, which is just... madness.
Which interpretation seems to make the most sense depends a lot on the framing of the explanation, and not very much on the experiments themselves. This comment [1] really drove home the Copenhagen interpretation for me, I quote:
>It's painfully easy to have a clear intuitive picture of quantum physics. You just have to ditch one concept.
Then I don't think I understood your question. I agree the Copenhagen interpretation doesn't make sense, mostly because I listen to Sean Carroll's podcast.
