But superdeterminism in the sense that Scott uses it doesn't just mean life is completely predetermined (I think that would be a fairly unobjectionable theory), it means that specifically the whole universe is predetermined in a way that just happens to cause human experimenters to choose measurement settings that accidentally reproduce the the values predicted by Bell's inequality.
It's that mind-blowingly unlikely coincidence with no explanation that scientists object to.
It's true that he uses it that way, but I think Sabine claims that's not the case and her theory is actually different. Other people with similar theories call it "retrocausal".
Scott doesn't believe it's possible for them to be different though.
It's that mind-blowingly unlikely coincidence with no explanation that scientists object to.