Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think it's counter productive at all. There was a period of time, when the appendix was (absurdly) considered vestigial, that surgeons would remove the appendix as a side quest if they happened to have the area opened for some other purpose.

That was a terrible idea, but one that was supported by science at the time. There are practical reasons to be skeptical about scientific assumptions.

Science becomes less wrong faster if we allow history to remind us that a lot of what we believe will likely turn out to be wrong.



A better example would be irradiating thymus glands.

Appendices are still removed, to this day, and people lacking them make do without. A thymus gland is harder to dispense with.


I’m happier without mine. It was causing me no end of digestion issues culminating with an attempt on my life.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: