I'd be interested to see the analysis or references to this analysis, if anybody has any links.
I'd be even more interested to see how GPA correlates with people actually getting an interview and getting a position there.
It wasn't too long ago that Google required you to have above a 3.8 GPA to be a serious candidate. I can accept that there isn't too much difference between people in the 3.8~4.0 GPA range, but I'd expect that there would be a significant difference between someone getting a 3.8 and a 3.3 from the same school.
"Unfortunately, most of the academic research suggests that the factors Google has put the most weight on — grades and interviews — are not an especially reliable way of hiring good people. [...] Dr. Carlisle set about analyzing the two million data points the survey collected. Among the first results was confirmation that Google’s obsession with academic performance was not always correlated with success at the company."
I seem to remember there being another better article than this one that went into more detail, but I can't find it right now. If you want the real story you'd probably have to ask a high ranking ex-googler...
Are you talking Major GPA or over all? Someone who is getting C's in art appreciation is probably just a bit wiser about how they spend their time than someone who gets all A's.
I'd be even more interested to see how GPA correlates with people actually getting an interview and getting a position there.
It wasn't too long ago that Google required you to have above a 3.8 GPA to be a serious candidate. I can accept that there isn't too much difference between people in the 3.8~4.0 GPA range, but I'd expect that there would be a significant difference between someone getting a 3.8 and a 3.3 from the same school.