Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is that people, including credentialed experts, have quick and easy answers to what makes a person a person, and really good language models expose a few of the weaknesses in those definitions. People still want to derive an "ought" from an "is".


How is it a problem in the case that you can fairly easily rule out the model being a person by any useful definition?


Useful for what, and for who?

I think it should be ruled out, but "by any useful definition" is wrong because "use" is at the heart of the matter here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: