I asked specific questions:

> What were these interests, and was their intent at the time of "voting against their interests" to injure their own group, and if not what was it?

> Do we have any insights into their state of mind when taking these actions, and a clear objective understanding of their actual interests, or is this just your interpretation of their actions?

This, at a glance, answers none of those. I'm not going to go do research to clarify someone else's claim. If they did not want to make it, they should not have made it, but they did, and thus it is up to them to clarify it.

Pattern recognition does not seem to be a forte of yours.