Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just because they don't mention this not-widely-accepted hypothesis you're going to dismiss it? Ok.


It doesn't offer anything else. So, yes. "Not widely accepted" means, exactly, "usefully checked against new evidence".

If you can point to anything beyond "woohoo, new older runes" and "maybe this helps distinguish between Greek and italic origin", do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: