Yes, but there are nuances, as mentioned in the article:
> In screenplays, two authors joined with & collaborated on the script, while two authors joined with and worked on the script at different times and may not have consulted each other at all.
I sometimes use it to avoid awkwardness in lists, e.g. "I ate fish & chips and drank a cup of tea".
I guess both examples use & as a stronger binder than and.
I prefer the form with the þorn, but it's harder to enter on a phone keyboard. (In fact I don't know if there's any way at all to input that combining superscript "e" on my phone.)
There are a bunch of old handwritten abbreviations that have fallen out of use probably due to typewriter/computer limitations.
It’s used as a symbol in programming, I have a hard time imagining a symbol that could replace “the”. That’s not to say there isn’t one that would be suitable, I just lack the creativity or imagination to think of one.
The use in programming is also just a result of it being available. It’s a great fit for binary AND, logical AND, but there’s countless symbols that we just assign to operators because they’re available.
Prolog uses /\ and \/ for bitwise AND and OR respectively, which certainly tips a hat to one system of logic notation—of course for conjunction and disjunction between clauses it uses , (comma) and ; (semi-colon)
If any word deserves a character, it’s “the.”