Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If it's extremely basic stuff and they've spent their entire life working on it, why did the two teams find different results? Thinking of objects moving 10% of light speed, or even two times the speed of light away from you, is not intuitive to a layman, and I can't imagine the Math.


Because the problem lies somewhere else which is not extremely basic. Relativistic effects are not the issue here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: