Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>However it's a little odd to go through the intermediate step of using MakeMKV if you're just compressing the resulting remux using Handbrake.

mkv makes a very usable source file to work with.

BD and DVD are not. They need to be extracted into something usable. A good form of something usable is the mkv makemkv makes.



Handbrake can open BDs and DVDs directly to rip.


Even if it handled all anti-copy schemes to perfection and had excellent handling of read errors and the like... it still requires a BD or DVD drive in the encoding computer, and to have the the BD or DVD in the drive, every time a new encode is needed.

That's highly inconvenient.

Makemkv only needs to run once. Afterwards, you can just deal with the file it creates, which is much more convenient than a disc.


I didn’t get the impression the guy encoding the resulting files (who I was responding to, not you) to H264, AC3 and didn’t seem to grok what a container was was keeping around these MKVs.

Yes, if you’re archiving blu rays MKV is king. If you’re ditching them after encoding why involve another application and step, that’s all I was telling him.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: