With a non-intrusive linked list type, can't you define the intrusive version as... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		NobodyNada 10 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Zig's new LinkedList API (it's time to learn field... With a non-intrusive linked list type, can't you define the intrusive version as `Node<void>`?

suspended_state 10 months ago | [–]

If that is possible in Zig to have a "void" struct field, then you are correct, but wouldn't this block a third-party user from defining a struct field named data later?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact