Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How about you let the browser makers decide whether they need to have their own engine to compete?

The fact is that Apple makes tens of billions in pure profit from Safari, and by closing off one of the principal ways of browser differentiation have ensured that they don't even need to invest in Safari. They can just lean back, safe in the knowledge that there is no risk of disruption.

(Like, the main selling point of Firefox on Android is support for browser extensions, and they're only able to do that thanks to having their own browser engine rather than using the platform-provided one.)

You never know where exactly the next steps in browser innovation are going to come from, but it is virtually guaranteed that they won't be just in the UI chrome. If you're e.g. going to make the best agentic AI browser in the world, it's not going to happen by reskinning Safari, and as a corollary Apple doesn't need to worry about competing with such a browser.



Yes because of all the great browser innovation on Android there are a plethora of great web apps on Android and companies are taking advantage of it so they can make one app that serves computer users over the web and Android users?

And Safari has had real browser extensions for years on iOS.

Where is the browser “innovation” on Android - the platform with 70% market share?

Last I checked, Firefox isn’t doing to well on Android either…

Firefox’s market share on mobile is 0.53%.

https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/world...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: