Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They may be, but there are lots of languages, lots of approaches, lots of methodologies and just a ton of different ways to "code", coding isn't one homogeneous activity that one model beats all the other models at.

> what specific tasks is one performing better than the other?

That's exactly why you create your own benchmark, so you can figure that out by just having a list of models, instead of testing each individually and basing it on "feels better".



> coding isn't one homogeneous activity that one model beats all the other models at

If you can't even replace one coding model with another, it's hard to imagine you can replace human coders with coding models.


You probably can't replace a seasoned COBOL programmer with a seasoned Haskell programmer. Does that mean that either person is bad at programming as a whole?


This was my point -- if programmers are not fungible, how can companies claim to be replacing them by the thousands with AI?


You don't need to use the same model/system for every task. "AI" isn't a monolith; there's a spectrum of solutions for a spectrum of problems, and figuring out what's applicable to your problem today is one of the larger problems of deployment.


What you mean "can't even replace"? You can, nothing in my comment says you cannot?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: