I think you misunderstood. She doesn't mean "real sex" as in normal-looking people. She means real sex in terms of behavior. The article says the site is a reaction to young men who have sex in the manner of porn (which I assume means a certain amount of macho performance, posing, a manner of making sounds and talking during sex, etc.) as opposed to the manner in which real people tend to have sex.
There is a very BIG market for "amateur porn" which is filled with "normal-looking" people as opposed to porn stars. This is more about education and promoting a different vision of the behavioral side of sex.
I didn't. And I agree - the market for normal people having vanilla sex is well served. People who are looking for it, get it. Most people are looking for stunt people having stunt sex.
>This is more about education and promoting a different vision of the behavioral side of sex.
It's moral education, promoting a particular vision of how she thinks people should be having sex. My guess is that it's also going to be a bit puritan, with soft focus, obstructive camera angles and a lot of cuts. It will probably make people whose sex lives are pretty statistically normal feel perverted and judged.
There is a very BIG market for "amateur porn" which is filled with "normal-looking" people as opposed to porn stars. This is more about education and promoting a different vision of the behavioral side of sex.