I have been reviewing your comment history here, including the pastebin texts you have linked.

I find your perspective intriguing. Mind sharing the offline writings you've referred to, if there are additional ones to the three pastebin texts I've come across?

Guys... Give me say, an accepted PR to mathlib and we can talk entropy

It is comical when scientific journalism has to describe not one famous name’s entropy, some up to six different kinds.

The mystical occult interpretations confuse the end value, its usage, the narrow term of loss, or the quirky unexpected.

Entropy is the equation, not the value. Which P? What is the surface area? How does P distribute over the surface area?

And loss is that value minus work achieved.

In all cases everywhere every time, entropy is the distribution of Potential over the surface area of negative Potential.

Patched?

These things are developing, look out for “The Exogenous of Power”. It may be in print within the decade. There is more to come, I hope you will follow along.