Also in the age of AI this argument would be flawed precisely because that "photo" from Buzz Aldrin could be AI-generated, but that's beside the point
1. Most of CS has been formally proven (that's what it's called computer science)
2. Here we were discussing someone who pretends to have "facts" and then just say "just play with it you will understand"...
Also in the age of AI this argument would be flawed precisely because that "photo" from Buzz Aldrin could be AI-generated, but that's beside the point