Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"To the executive branch it gave the power to declare war (war power act), and to make new law (administrative law). Then it created a new branch, the federal reserve, to make monetary policy."

The War Powers Resolution of 1973, aka War Powers Act, does not give the executive power to declare war. On the contrary, it was intended to limit the executive's ability to engage in armed conflict. It says so right at the top:

50 U.S. Code § 1541 - Purpose and policy

It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

One could argue that it hasn't worked all that well, but it is, for example, why George W. Bush got Congress to pass the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 before invading Iraq.

Also, "[t]hen it created a new branch, the federal reserve" is a sort of unusual way to describe something that happened 60 years earlier.





Distinction without a difference on the war powers act

Maybe, but my point is more that your conception and understanding of these things is terribly confused, incoherent, and just flat wrong.

For your own sake at least, it would be constructive for you to correct that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: