I'm very pro-AI and i think LLMs are an important technical step in achieving it (even if in the end it might turn out that LLMs helped achieve AI by showing how not to do it). But they suffer from premature commercialization. I'm very much against trying to sell them as the ultimate solution to everything. And another issue, not related to the technical aspect, is that business practices of certain self-styled "AI companies" calls for guillotining of their upper management.
Fair comeback, but there's still enough Artificial Insemination going on to make a hill sized lube slide with the leftover.
Disturbingly, a good number that attend a B&S Inseminators ball are off the traditional bogan scale (even allowing for cashed up bogans) .. arriving in limousines (albeit some rented) or private aircraft after graduating from some elite private school or another.
Traditionally it's a multiday paddock bash that begins with tuxedos and ballgowns, and morphs through food dye, lube, straw, burning cars, and a lot of not rated for televison behaviour to end in chaos.
All so asset rich multi millionaire nepo babies can swap keys and combine harvesters and pass on the thousand+ acre farm to another generation.
None the less it was yourself that asserted the I in AI stood for intelligence when clearly the AI Acronym has alernative priors.
> I'm not really interested in a summary of The debauched lives of Bogans
That seems a bit judgemental there;
bogan - "an uncouth or unsophisticated person regarded as being of low social status"
seems at odds with events often attended by millionaires and billionaires with multiple degrees and on the honour roles at snotty schools of high standing.
I'm for AI the technology. Who doesn't want cool sci-fi future tech? But I'm against AI being co-opted by our dear leaders to end white collar work and lock us all in a permanent underclass.
I'm not completely sold on the "agent" thing yet, although I do admit they can be pretty fun to use.