But, isn't it compatible with PEP 394[1]? As I see it, the mistake is to assume the `python`command links to python2.
The PEP itself should maybe point that out and not say that `python`SHOULD refer to python2 and at the same time MAY refer to python3. It only helps to the confussion.
The PEP itself should maybe point that out and not say that `python`SHOULD refer to python2 and at the same time MAY refer to python3. It only helps to the confussion.
[1]: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/