It's already not an apples to apples comparison. For instance, what's in the Node examples is much the use of frameworks built to enable rapid prototyping, not built to handle the needs of performance-oriented services. So we're comparing some optimized systems designed to be used in production versus frameworks designed to be terse instead of performant.
That's fair. Though I think anyone who just picks technologies based on these bar graphs alone is also missing the point, so some critical thinking is required to interpret these benchmarks, as usual.
