In the OP, the first example he used was of 'pro-palestinian propagandists', which made me think like you, but as I read more, most of his examples are actually of misdeeds by 'pro-Israel' propagandists.
I suspect he's actually partial to the Palestinian side, actually, although he tried to use examples from both partisan sides to paint a general picture of propaganda on wikipedia.
(Disclosure: I personally believe that Israeli policies and practices toward Palestinians constitute apartheid.)
Well, um, of course not, especially since you need that careful reading and critical thought to identify the propaganda the 'other' side is trying to embed in wikipedia. Naturally.
I suspect he's actually partial to the Palestinian side, actually, although he tried to use examples from both partisan sides to paint a general picture of propaganda on wikipedia.
(Disclosure: I personally believe that Israeli policies and practices toward Palestinians constitute apartheid.)