It is very hard to determine if you are saying that Jaaakobou is dishonest, or of his opponents are. (It seems to switch at the end when the photos are mentioned.)
Which I suppose is all part of the fun of political debate...
The article makes it clear that Jaakobou is dishonest (which is a different concept from Jaakobou actually being dishonest, but if the part I quoted is true, I'm satisfied that he is). In the original there is formatting that was stripped out by my copy-paste into a hacker news comment. Finally, as I parse it, the text "citing the content to Peace Now is problematic [...]" is a statement that the article attributes to Jaakobou, not a claim by the author.
Which I suppose is all part of the fun of political debate...