Soooo yeah, companies have things called "trademarks" and "copyrights"... you can't just go putting another company's name inside your company's name, and then make your imagery the same as theirs, without their lawyers sending you a strongly worded C&D. However I don't see why this would have to shut down based on that -- why not restart under a new, distinct name and branding?
Though you don't seem to be using Vine imagery... why wait for the inevitable?
I'll wait, I'm not gonna shut down with a strongly worded C&D. And besides, I don't believe Vine is aware of VineClient at the moment, this is being blown way out of proportion.
>I'm just saying that a C&D letter doesn't scare me.
Most hosting companies won't share your bravado.
>Y'all should read Vine's Terms of Service. I did.
>All right, title, and interest in and to the Services (excluding Content provided by users) are and will remain the exclusive property of Vine and its licensors. The Services are protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of both the United States and foreign countries. Vine reserves all rights not expressly granted in these Terms.
I bought VineFeed.com and VinePlayer.com awhile ago. The ToS (at least when I read it) said not to use the Vine name in domain names, so I put that on the backburner. I had wanted to make a couple of sites similar to Vine-videos.com though. I could see Vine bullying people in the future who use it in their name, even after being able to know a site is using it from referral / API data - and allow a site to grow large and then hit them with a "give this to us or we'll sue." If anyone wanted to partner and use the domains though I'd be up for it.
I agree! I highly doubt they would acquire VineClient, however the whole C&D thing is a bit far fetched. They have no grounds to send a C&D, those are all public endpoints that I'm using. If they wanted their content to be so secure, then perhaps they should have went a more secure way other than using HTTP as protocol of communication. But no, usually people take the easy route and that's why people like me are able to create things like VineClient.
The GP is suggesting you'll get a C&D for the use of the word Vine, not the use of what might be private APIs. This is where people get crafty (Instagram > Statigram). No good synonyms [1], and the name is so short that you easily leap from Wine to ShortVidClips - too near to too far.
The word "Vine" is in the dictionary, it does not solely serve the name of the Vine application. Also, none of the copyrighted logos / trademarks are used on the site. I'm not worried.
Academic in this instance. It would be an absolute disaster for Vine to assert or cooperate with a Weev-esque prosecution for something of this nature.
You clearly have no concept of how trademarks work or even what they are, and your callous attitude toward them is not only going to get you into legal trouble, but is incredibly antagonistic and off-putting. I'm not sure what you were expecting to get out of making this and posting it on HN, but you will find that your attitude has done nothing but garner you a lot of ill will in a community that you were clearly trying to impress (and have failed spectacularly at doing so).
I'm sorry for coming off that way. I just hate the fact that all you guys are coming off extremely negative and then wondering why I'm not responding the way you want me to. I've dealt with a thing or two in my career my friend. I'm not trying to impress the HN community by any means, I was simply posting a link to something I made. I don't live for HN, and this is clearly not a startup along the lines of HN. All you guys need to relax. It's all water under the bridge to me. If I get a C&D letter, I'll deal with it then. At the moment, the client is up and running and that's all that matters. Thanks for your input.
Heads up - the formatting on the page is kind of screwy. The bottom 2 buttons are partially obscured by the white bar on the bottom of the screen, and I'm not able to scroll down and reveal them. I'm on Chrome v 31 on Xubuntu.
Are you able to hijack the registration process also? A couple of days ago I had my first ever desire to upload a vine for Twitter, but being a Blackberry user I can't do a thing.
Vine in the name so likely they will get you for trademarks.
Not a first ever, a few others have made clients and had them shut down, or severely throttled on requests per day. So you may or may not be the "only" for today, but that won't last.
I don't mean to be a total downer I'm sure it was hard work, but basically you built a sand castle on the beach at low tide and in a few hours the tide will come in and wash it away.
They can't throttle the access as the requests are made client side. It's the same as if you were using your smartphone to access vine except on a web browser. None of the content goes through my server, the only thing that is served by my server is the PHP that holds it all together and the JS.
I had to make an extension because it acts as a blocker so I can modify the request headers before the request is sent to emulate the mobile app. Also, I need access to all data because of the cross-origin requests. Also, I needed all the requests to come directly from the user and not my server, as it would get banned probably. It literally emulates using your phone.
